Villavisencio

Villavisencio v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20225:20-cv-06620California789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 M.V., Case No. 20-cv-06620-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff M.V. appealed a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381, et seq. The sole issue presented concerned M.V.’s literacy. On January 24, 2022, the Court granted M.V.’s motion for summary judgment, denied the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment, remanded this matter for further development of the record, and entered judgment accordingly. See Dkt. Nos. 19, 20. M.V. now moves for an award of $4,070.14 for her attorney’s fees1 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.