Bolden

Bolden v. Contra Costa County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20223:20-cv-04254California3,384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEANDRE BOLDEN, Case No. 20-cv-04254-SK

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING CROSS-

v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

ALFONSO ACOSTA, et al., Defendants. Regarding Docket Nos. 86,

On April 15, 2022, Plaintiff Deandre Bolden (“Plaintiff”) moved for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 86.) Defendants Contra Costa County (“the County”), Sheriff’s Deputy Alfonso Acosta (“Acosta”), Sheriff’s Deputy Nathaniel Cope (“Cope”), and Sheriff’s Deputy D. Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) (collectively, “Defendants”) opposed the motion and cross-moved for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 92.) Plaintiff in turn opposed Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 96.) The Court heard oral argument on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on June 13, 2022. All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Dkt. Nos. 2, 13.) Having considered the submissions of the parties, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.