Stebbins

Stebbins v. Polano

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20224:21-cv-04184California2,933 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID A. STEBBINS, Case No. 21-cv-04184-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. INTERVENE, DENYING MOTION

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND

KARL POLANO, et al., DISMISSING ACTION Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 127, 138

12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to intervene filed by Alphabet, Inc. and YouTube, LLC. The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to intervene, DENIES the motion for default judgment, and DISMISSES the complaint WITH PREJUDICE. BACKGROUND Plaintiff David Stebbins (“Plaintiff”) asserts copyright infringement claims against defendants Raul Mateas, Karl Polano, and Frederick Allison (collectively, “Individual Defendants”). All three Individual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.