Loh

Loh v. Future Motion, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20225:21-cv-06088California5,057 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 JAMES LOH, et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-06088-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND;

v. DISMISSING AS MOOT MOTION TO

STRIKE

FUTURE MOTION, INC., Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 35,

Plaintiffs James Loh, Sean Michael Smith, Giovany Rico, and Bradley Reber assert claims for breach of express warranties, breach of implied warranties, false advertising, and unfair business practices under California, Pennsylvania, and Hawaii law. See Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 33. Before the Court is Defendant Future Motion, Inc.’s motion to strike and motion to dismiss. See Defendant Future Motion’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“MTS”), Dkt. No. 35; Defendant Future Motion’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“MTD”), Dkt. No. 37. Plaintiffs filed oppositions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.