Loh
Loh v. Future Motion, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 JAMES LOH, et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-06088-EJD
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND;
v. DISMISSING AS MOOT MOTION TO
STRIKE
FUTURE MOTION, INC., Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 35,
Plaintiffs James Loh, Sean Michael Smith, Giovany Rico, and Bradley Reber assert claims for breach of express warranties, breach of implied warranties, false advertising, and unfair business practices under California, Pennsylvania, and Hawaii law. See Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 33. Before the Court is Defendant Future Motion, Inc.’s motion to strike and motion to dismiss. See Defendant Future Motion’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“MTS”), Dkt. No. 35; Defendant Future Motion’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“MTD”), Dkt. No. 37. Plaintiffs filed oppositions…