Rubalcava

Rubalcava v. City Of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20225:20-cv-04191California2,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 LIONEL RUBALCAVA, Case No. 20-cv-04191-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE JULY 1, 2022 DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTE RE CONTENTION

INTERROGATORIES

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 143 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Lionel Rubalcava and defendant Douglas Kaleas ask the Court to resolve their dispute concerning Mr. Rubalcava’s responses to six of Mr. Kaleas’s contention interrogatories. Dkt. No. 143. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court overrules Mr. Rubalcava’s objection that these interrogatories are premature and requires Mr. Rubalcava to provide substantive responses to Interrogatories Nos. 10, 12, 14, and 16 and to supplement his responses to Interrogatories Nos. 11 and 15. I. BACKGROUND In this action, Mr. Rubalcava contends that Mr. Kaleas violated his constitutional rights by …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.