Kinnard

Kinnard v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20224:22-cv-02534California1,027 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KENNETH KINNARD, Case No. 22-cv-02534-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 11 STEVE NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.

12 On May 5, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff Kenneth Kinnard’s (“Plaintiff’s”) motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e) (“Section 1915”) with leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 4.) Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. For the following reasons, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s amended complaint, without leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of P&K Trucking, a family business started in Texas. (Dkt. No. 11, Am. Compl. ¶ 1, 34.) Plaintiff alleges that numerous defendants conspired to ruin his business by committing fraud between 1996 and 2002. Plaintiff’s allegations of fraud arise from alleged misconduct by the defendants in four judicial proceedings, two in California state court and two in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.