Hudson
Hudson v. Wells Fargo & Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KURT L. HUDSON, Case No. 21-cv-08296-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO
v. STRIKE
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 14, 35 Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion to strike. See Dkt. Nos. 13, 14, 35. The Court held a hearing on April 28, 2022. See Dkt. No. 44. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss and DENIES the motion to strike. I. BACKGROUND Pro se Plaintiff Kurt L. Hudson brings this putative class action against Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) and Wells Fargo & Company (the “Holding Company”). See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). According to the complaint, Plaintiff, an Illinois resident, obtained a mortgage loan from the Bank in 2005 for a second home in Florida. Compl. ¶ 63. Due to various hardships brought on by the 2008 recession, Plaintiff…