S.J. Amoroso Construction Inc v. Boneso Brothers Construction Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20225:22-cv-02586California3,098 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION INC, Case No. 22-cv-02586-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF S.J.

v. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION’S

MOTION TO REMAND

BONESO BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., LLC to remand this case to state court. Dkt. 10 (Notice of Motion), 11 (Memorandum of Points and Authorities), 12 (Declaration of Roger F. Liu), and 13 (Proposed Order). Defendant Boneso Brothers Construction Inc. (“Boneso”) opposes the motion (Dkt. 16), and Amoroso filed a reply (Dkt. 18). The Court held a hearing on July 12, 2022. All Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. 9, 15. After considering the Parties’ briefs, the arguments at the hearing, relevant law, and the case file, the Court GRANTS the motion to remand for the reasons that follow. I. BACKGROUND A. The State Court Action …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.