Garcia

Garcia v. Sood

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20223:21-cv-08584California492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 21-cv-08584-JCS

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

RAMESH SOOD, et al., UNRUH ACT CLAIM SHOULD NOT

BE DISMISSED

Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. No.

I. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION On July 5, 2022, Plaintiff Orlando Garcia filed an administrative motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 for an order requiring Defendants to provide three dates of availability for a settlement meeting under paragraph 8 of General Order 56, and awarding Garcia his attorneys’ fees for bringing this motion after Defendants failed to respond to a request for the settlement meeting. Local Rule 7-11 provides for an expedited schedule and perfunctory briefing of “miscellaneous administrative matters, not otherwise governed by a federal statute, Federal Rule, local rule, or standing order . . . such as motions to exceed otherwise applicable page limitations or motions to file documents under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.