Drevaleva

Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20223:22-cv-01585California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, Case No. 22-cv-01585-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. PRE-FILING APPLICATIONS

ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, et al., Docket Nos. 66-69 Defendants.

12 13 After the Court declared Plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva a vexatious litigant and entered judgment against her on July 7, 2022, Plaintiff has filed pre-filing applications for the following motions: (1) motion to vacate judgment as to Defendant Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) (Docket No. 67)1, (2) motion to vacate judgment as to Defendant Alameda Health System (AHS) (Docket No. 68), and (3) second motion to vacate judgment as to AHS (Docket No. 69). Plaintiff seeks to file all three underlying motions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) and 60(b). “Amendment or alteration is appropriate under Rule 59(e) if (1) the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) the district court committed clear error or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.