Wilkins

Wilkins v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20223:20-cv-01939California2,510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEON MCNEIL WILKINS, Case No. 20-cv-01939-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Deon McNeil Wilkins filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Mr. Wilkins’s original complaint was reviewed by the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and dismissed with leave to amend. See Docket No. 12. After Mr. Wilkins was granted an extension of time to amend, a Court order was returned as undeliverable. See Docket Nos. 18, 19. The Court then dismissed the instant action for failure to comply with Local Rule 3-11(a). See Docket No. 20. Mr. Wilkins subsequently moved to reopen this action, which request the Court granted. See Docket Nos. 22, 24. After several administrative motions and extensions of time, Mr. Wilkins filed an amended complaint (“FAC”). See Docket No. 34. The FAC is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.