Kirkwood
Kirkwood v. Sapporo Steak & Sushi House, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KAILEY KIRK WOOD, Case No.22-cv-00340-NC
Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 20 SAPPORO STEAK & SUSHI HOUSE, INC., Defendant.
16 The Court having entered the Consent Decree, Dkt. 20, and it appearing that no
|| issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action 19 || and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is || directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, || provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 || Dated: July 20, 2022 hKeo——_