Kijakazi

D. (Labryssa) v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20225:21-cv-04233California728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 JESSE “LABRYSSA” D., Case No. 21-cv-04233-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, [Re: ECF No. 33] Defendant.

10 The Commissioner has filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment in this case under 11 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). ECF No. 33. The Commissioner does not challenge the 12 Court’s overall conclusion in its June 6, 2022 order that substantial evidence did not support the 13 ALJ’s decision regarding the medical opinion of Dr. Laura Jean Catlin and that the case must be 14 remanded. The Commissioner instead asserts that the Court erred in stating (and citing cases in 15 agreement) that it “remains to be seen” how revised Social Security regulations would affect the 16 legal standard applicable to evaluating an ALJ’s treatment of medical opinions. ECF No. 31 17 (“Remand Order”) at 11–12. The time for Plaintiff to file a response has passed. The Court will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.