Jones

Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20223:15-cv-02726California3,692 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMANDA JONES, Case No. 15-cv-02726-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine, ECF No. 273, and Defendants’ Motions in Limine, ECF Nos. 256-263, 265-270, 272, 276. On July 21, 2022, the Court heard oral argument on the motions in limine. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine, GRANTS Defendants’ Motions in Limine Nos. 1–7, DENIES Defendants’ Motions in Limine Nos. 8–9, GRANTS Defendants’ Motions in Limine 10–15, and DENIES Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 16. A. Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine Plaintiff moves to exclude evidence of Plaintiff’s prior accidents and litigation as irrelevant under Federal Rules of Evidence 401 and 402 and unfairly prejudicial under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. ECF No. 273. Defendants argue the evidence may be used for impeachment and is relevant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.