Rushing
Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM RUSHING, et al., Case No. 16-cv-01421-WHO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC., et al., DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PERLIN’S ADMINISTRATIVE
Defendants. MOTION TO SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 268, 271
13 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Elizabeth Perlin purchased sheets—the PB Classic 400-Thread-Count Sheet Set, to be precise—from defendants Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Williams-Sonoma DTC, Inc., and Williams-Sonoma Advertising, Inc. (collectively, “Williams-Sonoma”) on January 19, 2011, and January 28, 2011. Both sets of sheets ripped shortly after she began using them. Several years later, Perlin learned that, based on some methods used to calculate thread count, the thread count in the PB Classic 400-Thread-Count sheets is allegedly closer to 200 threads. As a result, Perlin contends that Williams-Sonoma…