Hanson

Hanson v. Dowling

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20223:22-cv-01084California236 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CHRISTINA J. HANSON, Case No. 22-cv-01084-CRB Plaintiff, v. ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA

PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL

CHARLES DOWLING, et al., Defendants. In this case, pro se Plaintiff Christina Hanson alleged that Defendants implanted a 14 || “Stargate Remote Viewing Device” in her right eye. Compl. (dkt. 1). In her amended || complaint, Hanson did not provide any further detail suggesting that her claims were at all 16 || plausible. Report and Recommendation (dkt. 20). On June 24, 2022, the Court adopted || the Report and Recommendation and dismissed the case as lacking minimum legal 18 || viability under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Order (dkt. 23). After Hanson appealed, the Ninth Circuit referred the appeal to this Court for the 20 || limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue or || whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See Dkt. 27. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.