Scott Crawford v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SCOTT CRAWFORD,
Case No. 17-cv-02664-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 13 Defendants.
15 STEPHAN NAMISNAK, et al., Case No. 17-cv-06124-RS Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 19 Defendants.
21 ORDER AND OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiffs are three people using electric wheelchairs who asked Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiary Rasier, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” or “Uber”) to provide wheelchair-accessible vehicle (“WAV”) service (“UberWAV”) in their home cities of New Orleans, Louisiana and Jackson, Mississippi. After Uber declined, Plaintiffs sued, accusing Uber of violating parties presented evidence of various methods for implementing WAV service, the costs of WAV service, and Uber’s implementation of WAV service in other cities, among other topics. For the reasons explained below, Plaintiffs have not met their…