Robinson

BGC Inc. v. Robinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20224:22-cv-01582California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BGC INC., Case No. 22-cv-01582-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER CONDITIONALLY

v. GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

RAUHMEL FOX ROBINSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 43 Defendants.

12 The Court has received and considered the motion to withdraw as counsel for Defendants, filed by Clark Hill LLP and Clark Hill PLLC (“Clark Hill”). The Court finds good cause and GRANTS the motion. Mr. Robinson has stated that he intends to represent himself. Accordingly, Mr. Robinson shall proceed hereinafter pro se unless and until counsel appears on his behalf, and the parties must serve him personally with all papers and motions in this matter. When withdrawal by an attorney from an action is not accompanied by simultaneous appearance of substitute counsel, leave to withdraw may be subject to the condition that papers continue to be served on counsel unless and until the client appears by other counsel. See Civ. L.R. 11-5(b). As a corporation,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.