Mcloud

Mcloud v. County of Sonoma et.al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20224:22-cv-04284California808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DENISE MCLOUD, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04284-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 6 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants.

12 A temporary restraining order is an “extraordinary remedy” that the court should award only upon a clear showing that the party is entitled to such relief. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). Such an order may be issued only where the moving party has established: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a likelihood of irreparable harm to plaintiff in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities tips in plaintiff's favor; and (4) that an injunction is in the public interest. See id. at 22. This Court may issue a temporary restraining order without written or oral notice only if (A) specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.