Sarmiento

Sarmiento v. Marquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20224:21-cv-06712California4,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIELLE SARMIENTO, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06712-PJH Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

RUBY MARQUEZ, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 41 Defendants.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ first amended complaint (“FAC”) came on for hearing before this court on July 7, 2022. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Aerin Murphy. Plaintiffs failed to appear. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendants’ motion for the following reasons. BACKGROUND A. Factual History Plaintiffs Danielle Sarmiento and Michael Sanchez allege they were foster parents of a foster child who was placed with them by the Family and Children’s Services Division (“FCS”) of the Human Services Department (“Department”) for the County of Santa Cruz (“County”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.