Poorsina
Poorsina v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALI POORSINA, Case No. 21-cv-05098-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. No. 32 Defendant.
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6) to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Ali Poorsina’s amended complaint. [Docket No. 32.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7- 1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Poorsina makes the following allegations in the amended complaint, all of which are taken as true for purposes of this motion. Poorsina is the previous owner of real property at 1563 28th Avenue, San Francisco, California (the “property”). [Docket No. 29 (Am. Compl.) 3.] He alleges that on September 7, 2017, the property was sold at a “wrongful foreclosure trustee’s sale.” …