Taylor

Taylor v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20224:20-cv-07692California2,880 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIMOTHY TAYLOR, Case No. 20-cv-07692-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN TO AMEND FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 21, 22 11 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion for summary judgment filed by the City and County of San Francisco (the “City”) and Kevin Spore (“Spore”) (collectively “Defendants”). Also before the Court for consideration is the motion for leave to amend the complaint filed by Plaintiff Timothy Taylor (“Taylor”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds that the motions can be resolved without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court VACATES the hearing set for August 5, 2022, GRANTS Defendants’ motion, and DENIES Taylor’s motion. BACKGROUND It is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.