Ameen

Ameen v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20223:22-cv-00140California2,919 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 OMAR ABDULSATTAR AMEEN, Case No. 22-cv-00140-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. ENFORCE

DAVID JENNINGS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants.

On April 19, 2022, I granted Petitioner Omar Ameen’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in limited part. Dkt. No. 31. Specifically, I required respondents (the United States Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security (“DHS”), and the Director of the San Francisco Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) Field Office to provide Ameen a constitutionally sufficient bond hearing by placing the burden of proof on the government to show by clear and convincing evidence that he remains a flight risk or danger to the community during the pendency of the removal proceedings that the United States brought against him. Pursuant to my Order, the assigned Immigration Judge (“IJ”) held a second bond hearing over three days in May 2022. In support of defendants’ argument at that bond…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.