Revelez

Revelez v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20225:22-cv-01738California2,368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD REVELEZ,

Case No. 22-cv-01738 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL; TERMINATING

OTHER MOTION KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., 15 Defendants. (Docket Nos. 3, 6)

17 Plaintiff, a state inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Kathleen Allison, the Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), and “multiple doe defendants.” Dkt. No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. Dkt. No. 8. 22 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.