Rando

Johnson v. Rando

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20225:21-cv-00673California3,876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-00673-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

MARISSA RANDO, [Re: ECF No. 29] Defendant.

12 In this action, Plaintiff Scott Johnson asserts claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (“ADA”), and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52 (“Unruh Act”). See ECF No. 1. Johnson seeks injunctive relief, statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs of suit. Id. Defendant Marissa Rando (“Defendant”) initially appeared in this matter and filed a motion to dismiss, which the Court denied. ECF No. 22. Defendant failed to appear after the denial of the motion to dismiss, and at Johnson’s request, the Clerk of Court has entered default against Defendant. See ECF No. 26. Now before the Court is Johnson’s motion for default…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.