Robbins

Robbins v. PlushCare, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20223:21-cv-03444California2,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SARAH ROBBINS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03444-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AFFORDING

PLUSHCARE, INC., et al., PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants.

12 Before the Court is defendants PlushCare, Inc. and PlushCare of California, Inc., A.P.C.'s (collectively, "PlushCare") "Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b)," filed June 3, 2022. Plaintiffs Sarah Robbins ("Robbins") and Tiffany Smith ("Smith") have filed opposition, to which PlushCare has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.2 In the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), plaintiffs assert eight Causes of Action based on their allegations that the "automatic renewal offer terms" on PlushCare's website are not in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.