Abramowitz
Palantir Technologies Inc. v. Abramowitz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC., Case No. 19-cv-06879-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING ABRAMOWITZ’S
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
MARC L. ABRAMOWITZ, [Re: ECF No. 312] Defendant.
12 Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Marc Abramowitz on breach of contract and trade secret misappropriation claims brought by Plaintiff Palantir Technologies Inc. See ECF No. 312 (“MSJ”); see also ECF No. 328 (“Reply”). Palantir opposes the motion. See ECF No. 316 (“Opp.”). The Court held a hearing on the motion on July 21, 2022. ECF No. 336. For the reasons explained below, the motion is DENIED as to both claims. I. LEGAL STANDARD “A party is entitled to summary judgment if the ‘movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’” City of Pomona v. SQM N. Am. Corp., 750 F.3d 1036, 1049 (9th Cir.…