Harris
Harris v. Broomfield
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-00283-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
v. AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
CLERIC MUHAMMAD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a He also brings a motion for temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and for preliminary injunction (“PI”). ECF No. 17. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request for a TRO/PI. DISCUSSION Plaintiff has filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction prohibiting Defendants from denying him the ability to supplement his GMO-free (RMAP) diet, that is required by his religion, with non-Halal or non-Kosher food items from the prison canteen or…