Prescott

Prescott v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20225:20-cv-02101California8,719 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 STEVEN ROBERT PRESCOTT, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02101-BLF Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR CLASS

v. CERTIFICATION RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, Defendant. [Re: ECF 111] 13 14 Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against Defendant Reckitt Benckiser LLC (“Reckitt”) on behalf of consumers who purchased Woolite laundry detergent labeled with the phrases “COLOR RENEW” and/or “revives colors” (collectively, “the color renew/revive representation”). Plaintiffs assert that the color renew/revive representation was false or misleading, because Woolite laundry detergent does not renew or revive color in clothing. They assert consumer claims on behalf of the residents of three states, California, New York, and Massachusetts. Plaintiffs move for certification of a California class, a New York class, and a Massachusetts class of consumers. Reckitt opposes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.