Villasenor

Jackson v. Villasenor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20223:20-cv-08695California3,541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DOUGLAS V. JACKSON, Case No. 20-cv-08695-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

VILLASENOR, et al., TO RENEWAL Defendants. Docket Nos. 22,

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION In this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action, Douglas Jackson complains about prison officials’ alleged retaliatory behavior and due process violations. The Defendants, Correctional Officers Luna and Villasenor, now move for partial summary judgment. Docket No. 22 (“Summary Judgment Motion” or “MSJ”). Mr. Jackson opposes the motion. Docket No. 23 (“Opposition”). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment will be denied without prejudice to renewal accompanied by more complete evidence. II. BACKGROUND A. Mr. Jackson’s Interactions with Defendants Mr. Jackson alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.