Harrington
Harrington v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEVEN HARRINGTON, Case No. 20-cv-04148-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES
ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendant.
13 Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS the motion for the following reasons. BACKGROUND On June 23, 2020, plaintiff appealed the decision from the Social Security Administration that he was not eligible for disability benefits. Dkt. 1. On April 12, 2021, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross moved for summary judgment. Dkt. 20, 21. On March 14, 2022, this court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary…