Devashrayee

Devashrayee v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20223:22-cv-03756California1,028 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFREY J. DEVASHRAYEE, Case No. 22-cv-03756-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE AND

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE

COMPANY,

11 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is plaintiff Jeffrey J. Devashrayee's ("Devashrayee") "Motion to Extend Time to File Opposition to Defendants' (sic) Motion to Transfer Venue and to Continue the Hearing Date," filed July 26, 2022. Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company ("Union Pacific") has filed opposition. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows. On May 4, 2022, Devashrayee filed the above-titled action in the Superior Court of California, in and for the County of San Francisco. On June 24, 2022, Union Pacific removed the action to district court, and, on July 1, 2022, filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.