Emami

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FARANGIS EMAMI, et al., Case No. 18-cv-01587-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

PARS EQUALITY CENTER, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07818-JD

Plaintiffs, v.

ANTONY BLINKEN, et al., Defendants.

17 In these related cases, plaintiffs ask for summary judgment on their claims under the Administrative Procedure Act. Dkt. No. 197. They do not seek summary judgment for their APA claims based on the Accardi doctrine, see id. at 11 n.13, and so those claims are not addressed in this order. They request summary judgment only on their APA claims brought pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §§ 706(2)(A) and (D). See id. at 16-23. The Court finds plaintiffs’ motion to be suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). The government makes only one real argument in opposition to plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion. They say that plaintiffs’ claims are moot because President…