Postpichal

Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20223:19-cv-07270California3,492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

URSULA FREITAS, Plaintiff, No. C 19-07270 WHA

v.

ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S

CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC, MOTION TO DECERTIFY AND

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

Defendant. AMEND CLASS DEFINITION

15 INTRODUCTION In this RICO class action, defendant moves to decertify the class. Plaintiff moves to amend the class definition. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT. STATEMENT Plaintiff Ursula Freitas claims that defendant, Cricket Wireless, LLC, advertised 4G wireless service and sold 4G-capable phones in markets where defendant did not actually provide 4G coverage. Thus, plaintiff alleges harm on behalf of a class of similarly situated Cricket customers who paid for 4G phones and coverage but received only 3G coverage, which was slower and cheaper than 4G coverage. A previous order in this action certified the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.