Postpichal
Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20223:19-cv-07270California3,492 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
URSULA FREITAS, Plaintiff, No. C 19-07270 WHA
v.
ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S
CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC, MOTION TO DECERTIFY AND
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
Defendant. AMEND CLASS DEFINITION
15 INTRODUCTION In this RICO class action, defendant moves to decertify the class. Plaintiff moves to amend the class definition. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT. STATEMENT Plaintiff Ursula Freitas claims that defendant, Cricket Wireless, LLC, advertised 4G wireless service and sold 4G-capable phones in markets where defendant did not actually provide 4G coverage. Thus, plaintiff alleges harm on behalf of a class of similarly situated Cricket customers who paid for 4G phones and coverage but received only 3G coverage, which was slower and cheaper than 4G coverage. A previous order in this action certified the…