Davis

Johnson v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20225:21-cv-01693California1,947 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL DAVID JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-01693-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE;

v.

DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

RON DAVIS, et al., FORMA PAUPERIS; Defendants. DENYING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT

13 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials for violating his constitutional rights at San Quentin State Prison. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s Second Amendment Complaint (SAC), Dkt. No. 20, is ordered served on Defendants. ANALYSIS A. STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.