Johnson v. Goodwill Of Silicon Valley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20225:21-cv-08410California620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-08410-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER SUA SPONTE DISMISSING

v. UNRUH ACT CLAIM WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY,

Defendant.

Plaintiff’s Complaint in this case contains two causes of action: (1) violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”); and (2) violation of the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53 (“Unruh Act”). Dkt. 1. Plaintiff asserts that the Court has federal question jurisdiction over the ADA claim and supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. Id. ¶¶ 5-6. On June 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Indication of Mootness of ADA Claim for Injunctive Relief,” which stated that Defendant had provided sufficient evidence that it had remediated all alleged barriers to access at the business that is the subject of this lawsuit. Dkt. 12. According to Plaintiff, “[t]his suggests Plaintiff’s claim for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.