Walker

Walker v. Krol

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20224:15-cv-05819California1,636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFREY E. WALKER, Case No. 15-cv-05819-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

VACATE JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

v. FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(6)

KROL, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at San Francisco County Jail, filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). Dkt. No. 38. Defendants have filed an opposition. Dkt. No. 46. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. DISCUSSION I. Procedural History On or about December 18, 2015, Plaintiff filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that while he was housed at San Francisco County Jail as a pretrial detainee in or around June 2015, his conditions of confinement violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Dkt. Nos. 1, 9. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.