Nieto Gomez v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20225:22-cv-02171California1,105 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

| hereby certify that the foregoing is a true cop of the original on file in this office. 65 Clerk, U.S. District Court @ Eastern District of Michigan □□□ By: Sarah Schoenherr UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL Deputy on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: CHRYSLER PACIFICA FIRE RECALL MDL No. 3040

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

TRANSFER ORDER

Before the Panel:* Plaintiff in one action (O/sen) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in either the Northern District of California or the Central District of California. This litigation currently consists of seven actions pending in four districts — three actions in the Eastern District of Michigan and four actions in various California districts, as listed on Schedule A. Since the filing of the motion, the Panel has been notified of four related actions — one in the Eastern District of Michigan (Ramirez), one in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Bagley), and two in the Central District of California (Travato and Macias).' The four actions in the Eastern District of Michigan (including Ramirez) recently were consolidated for all purposes. Thus, there are effectively…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.