Storms
Storms v. County of Monterey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 il RICHARD STORMS, Case No. 20-cv-07913-NC
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD v. NOT BE JUDICIALLY ESTOPPED FROM
COUNTY OF MONTEREY, CONTRADICTING ITS
PREVIOUS CONCESSIONS
© Defendant.
A In its Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Defendant S conceded that: (1) Plaintiff was qualified for his job, with or without accommodation, during all relevant periods of time, and (2) the April 26, 2019, Formal Notice of Discipline 19 |! is an adverse employment action. From the pretrial filings, it appears that Defendant intends to relitigate these issues. But “[t]ruth is not a weather vane. It does not veer when 21 |! the winds of self-interest change.” Dep’t of Transp. v. Coe, 112 Ill. App. 3d 506, 507 □□□□ I Ct. App. 1983). …