Mcloud

Mcloud v. County of Sonoma et.al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20224:22-cv-04284California2,257 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DENISE MCLOUD, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04284-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER VACATING TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 6 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants.

12 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 25, 2022, seven pro se Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendants County of Sonoma and City of Santa Rosa, as well as several individual employees of these entities. See Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiffs allege that they are unhoused residents of a portion of the Joe Rodota Regional Trail in Santa Rosa, California. Dkt. No. 1 at ¶¶ 1–6, 16. They allege that on Friday, July 22, 2022, they were served eviction notices by Sonoma County Regional Park Rangers, which indicated that they had to relocate by Tuesday, July 26, 2022, at 8:00 a.m., or they could be cited, arrested, or face criminal prosecution. See id. at ¶¶ 19, 25; see also Dkt. No. 6-1, Ex. C at A (“Notice to Vacate”). The Notice to Vacate stated that Plaintiffs “were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.