Ward

Ward v. United Airlines, Inc.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20223:15-cv-02309California4,569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES E. WARD and BRUCE RICHARDS, No. C 15-02309 WHA 9 individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ORDER RE MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED AIRLINES, INC., Defendant.

INTRODUCTION In this certified class action involving alleged deficiencies on wage statements for 17 airline pilots, plaintiffs move for partial summary judgment and defendant moves for summary 18 judgment. For the reasons expressed herein, this order GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART 19 both motions. 20 STATEMENT Plaintiffs Charles E. Ward and Bruce Richards represent a class of current or former pilots employed by defendant United Airlines, a major passenger airline serving destinations all 24 over the world. In April 2015, plaintiff Ward filed this action in the Superior Court of the State 25 of California, County of San Francisco, and United promptly removed the case here pursuant to 26 the Class Action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.