Huynh

Huynh v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20223:22-cv-00142California7,585 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRI MINH HUYNH, Case No. 22-cv-00142-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

WALMART, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 211, 213, 214, 215, 217, 220 Defendants.

12 This matter comes before the Court upon the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Walmart, Inc. (“Walmart”); Doug McMillon; Brett Biggs; Marc Lore; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP (“Gibson Dunn”); Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.; Rachel Brass; The deRubertis Law Firm; David deRubertis; EPIQ eDiscovery Solutions (“EPIQ”); Douglas Kasales; Lighthouse Document Technologies (“Lighthouse”); BOFA Securities (“Bank of America”); and Robert Ohmes. Plaintiff Tri Minh Huynh (“Plaintiff”), proceeding without the assistance of counsel, alleges Defendants (1) violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c), 1964; (2) conspired to violate RICO; and (3) violated his Fifth Amendment rights. (Dkt. No. 171.) After carefully considering…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.