Rogalinski

Rogalinski v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20223:22-cv-02482California3,539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RICHARD ROGALINSKI, Case No. 22-cv-02482-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS

META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant.

Plaintiff Richard Rogalinski alleges that Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution when it censoring his Facebook posts about COVID-19. See Compl. (dkt. 1). Purporting to represent a class of similarly situated Facebook users, Rogalinski alleges that Meta took this action in concert with the Biden Administration. Meta moves to dismiss, arguing that Rogalinsky has not pleaded state action. See MTD (dkt. 51). Finding oral argument unnecessary, the Court GRANTS the motion and denies leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND A. Parties Rogalinski is a resident of Florida. Compl. ¶ 28. The putative class members are individuals whose comments about COVID-19 were allegedly censored by Meta beginning on January 20, 2021. Id. ¶ 29. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.