Avila

Bayside Solutions, Inc. v. Avila

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20224:21-cv-08738California829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BAYSIDE SOLUTIONS, INC., Case No. 21-cv-08738-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ENTRY OF A PROTECTIVE

ANTONIO AVILA, et al., ORDER Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 37

13 Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for entry of a protective order. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for entry of a protective order. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Bayside Solutions, Inc. filed this action against Antonio Avila, Armando Avila, and RecruitGigs (collectively, “defendants”). Dkt. 1. Plaintiff raises eight causes of action against defendants including misappropriation of trade secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 1836, et seq.) and under California’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Cal. Civ.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.