Johnson v. Jia He Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20223:21-cv-04702California502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-04702-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

AND GRANTING REQUEST TO

JIA HE CORPORATION, DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 31,

12 The Court ordered Plaintiff Scott Johnson to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his claim under California’s Unruh Act for the reasons stated in Garcia v. Maciel, No. 21-cv-03743-JCS, 2022 WL 395316 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2022), which in turn relied on the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F.4th 1202 (9th Cir. 2021). See Order to Show Cause (“OSC,” dkt. 31) (text-only docket entry). Johnson concedes that there is nothing novel about this case that would alter the Court’s previous reasoning in Garcia. Pl.’s OSC Response (dkt. 33). The Court therefore declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and DISMISSES Johnson’s Unruh…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.