Turner
Turner v. Windsor Healthcare Center of Oakland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VALARIE TURNER, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02466-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REMAND
v. Re: Dkt. No. 14 WINDSOR OAKRIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER, LP, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is the motion to remand filed by Plaintiffs Valarie Turner, Syble Thomas, Betty Smith, and Bobbie Frost. See Dkt. No. 14. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). In their opposition, Defendants appear to concede that controlling Ninth Circuit authority, Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLC, 27 F.4th 679 (9th Cir. 2022), requires remand. See Dkt. No. 11 at 5 (“Defendants are aware that this Court is bound by Ninth Circuit precedent in Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLC . . . .”). This Court has recently found that remand is warranted under similar circumstances, and adopts the reasoning of that case in its entirety. See Martinez v. Novato Healthcare Ctr.,…