Gerold

Gerold v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20223:21-cv-02217California6,299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAURA ADRIANA GEROLD, Case No. 21-cv-02217-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR REMAND

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. No. 18, 21 Defendant.

Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment in this Social Security Act dispute. Plaintiff, Laura Adriana Gerold, moves for summary judgment, or remand, arguing the ALJ’s decision is unsupported by substantial evidence. Dkt. No. 18 (Ptf’s MSJ). Defendant, Kilolo Kijakazi, cross-moves for summary judgment arguing the ALJ’s decision should be affirmed. Dkt. No. 21 (Def.’s MSJ). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for remand and DENIES Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 18 BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a 49-year-old woman. She completed high school, and has no specialized job training, or trade/vocational school education. She reports past work as a food service trainee and 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.