Harrison
Harrison v. IFit Health & Fitness
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PATRINA HARRISON, Case No. 21-cv-10079-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST
IFIT HEALTH & FITNESS, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 30
13 Before the court is defendant iFit, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”). The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for August 11, 2022, has been VACATED. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND Pro se plaintiff Patrina Harrison is an asthma and allergy sufferer who resides in San Francisco. FAC ¶ 8. Defendant iFit, Inc. (erroneously sued as IFIT HEALTH & FITNESS; ICON HEALTH & FITNESS/NORDICTRACK; AND UTS) is a manufacturer of fitness equipment, including treadmills,…