Harrison

Harrison v. IFit Health & Fitness

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20224:21-cv-10079California3,289 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRINA HARRISON, Case No. 21-cv-10079-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST

IFIT HEALTH & FITNESS, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 30

13 Before the court is defendant iFit, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”). The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for August 11, 2022, has been VACATED. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND Pro se plaintiff Patrina Harrison is an asthma and allergy sufferer who resides in San Francisco. FAC ¶ 8. Defendant iFit, Inc. (erroneously sued as IFIT HEALTH & FITNESS; ICON HEALTH & FITNESS/NORDICTRACK; AND UTS) is a manufacturer of fitness equipment, including treadmills,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.