Armstrong-Harris

Armstrong-Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20224:21-cv-07637California5,033 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CEDRIC ARMSTRONG-HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-07637-HSG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 7 Defendants.

12 This is a pro se action filed by Plaintiff Cedric Armstrong-Harris. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.1 moves to dismiss the complaint. Dkt. No. 7. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion.2 I. BACKGROUND Pro se Plaintiff Cedric Armstrong-Harris brings this lawsuit against Defendants Wells Fargo and Specialized Loan Servicing. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges the following: Plaintiff is the fee simple owner of a residential property in Oakland, California. In March 2007, a loan was taken out on the property and issued by World Savings Bank (which was later acquired by Wells Fargo). In June 2021, after Plaintiff could not pay the monthly mortgage due, Specialized Loan Servicing demanded payment of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.