Pelton

Pelton v. Amador

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20225:22-cv-02027California1,433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAN MICHAEL PELTON,

Case No. 22-cv-02027-JCS (PR) Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT 9 RICHARD AMADOR, et al., 10 Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sean Michael Pelton alleges San Francisco and South San Francisco police officers are liable for violating his Fourth Amendment rights. His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff has not provided sufficient factual information to state claims against all defendants. Accordingly, on or before September 19, 2022, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by September 19, 2022, or if the amended complaint is insufficient, this suit will be reassigned to a district judge with a report and recommendation that the suit be dismissed. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction for all purposes under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.